Texas State Logo

Paper Towel Testing

Jennifer, Kim, Aniekan

Description
Concept Map
Assessment Plan
Rubric
Calendar
Resources
Lesson Plan 1
Lesson Plan 2
Lesson Plan 3
Orientation Video
Clinical Interviews
Modifications
Elementary Science Methods Home

Lesson Plan 2: Paper Towel Testing

AUTHOR'S NAME: Jennifer Lickert      

TECHNOLOGY LESSON (circle one):         Yes      No

DATE OF LESSON: Days 2 and 3 of the week long unit

LENGTH OF LESSON: 1-2 class periods (30-45 minutes each)

NAME OF COURSE: Science

SOURCE OF THE LESSON: GEMS Guide: Paper Towel Testing

TEKS ADDRESSED:

  • 5.1A: demonstrate safe practices during field and laboratory investigations
  • 5.1B make wise choices
  • 5.2A plan and implement descriptive and simple experimental investigations including asking well-defined questions, formulating testable hypotheses, and selecting and using equipment
  • 5.2B collect information by observing and measuring
  • 5.2D communicate valid conclusions
  • 5.3B draw inferences based on information related to promotional materials for products and services

 

CONCEPT STATEMENT:

The Texas Essential Knowledge Skills are explicit when they state that students will “conduct field and laboratory investigations following home and school safety procedures and environmentally appropriate and ethical practices,” and “the student uses scientific methods during field and laboratory investigations.” The Benchmarks for Science Literacy state that math, science, and technology are integral parts of scientific literacy. Science involves students in determining reasons for occurrences by carefully observing and trying to fit those observations into a schema to construct meaning. It is also important for students to learn that doing the “same” investigation does not always yield the same results. One reason for this could be differences in procedures used by different groups of students during their investigations. This lesson will address inconsistencies in procedures and will attempt to show students that with careful attention to procedure, investigations will yield reliable, accurate results.

 

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES:

·       The student will be able to plan and implement simple experiments to determine which brand of paper towel is the “best buy.”

·       The student will be able to use tools like mass weights, droppers, measuring spoons, and graduated cylinders to calculate accurate measurements.

·       The students will be able to test claims of manufacturers to determine what brand of paper towel stands up to its promotional material.

·       The student will be able to communicate in writing and speech the conclusions they have draw and offer support for their conclusions.

 

RESOURCES:

·       Paper towels (1 sheet from each of the four brands)

·       Water

·       Graduated cylinders (1-25 mL for each group of 4 students)

·       Gram weights (1 set for each group of 4 students)

·       Tray (1 for each group of 4 students)

 

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS:                           

·       Keep your work area straightened to avoid spills

·       Be careful to clean up all spills especially if the spill is on the floor

·       Walk during the lab to avoid slipping on wet floors

·       Do not drink any of the water from the lab

 

SUPLEMENTARY MATERIALS, HANDOUTS:

·       Handouts (Wet strength test/absorbency data capture sheet handouts for every student)
Wet Strength    Absorbency

 

Engagement

 

Time: 10 minutes

What the Teacher Will Do

Probing Questions

Student Responses

Potential Misconceptions

The teacher will have each group post their findings from their specific tests (absorbency or strength) on the board for the class to see.

What does our data tell us? Are there differences among the data? Why might the data from different groups be dissimilar? How does your test procedure compare with another groups procedure? What are the similarities or differences of the groups’ testing?

Students may think that everyone tested the same way they did. Some students may not see small inconsistencies in testing (like dropping a gram weight onto the paper towel or placing the gram weight into the paper towel) as an inconsistency.

 

Exploration

 

Time: 10 minutes

What the Teacher Will Do

Probing Questions

Student Responses

Potential Misconceptions

The teacher will ask students to model some of the procedures of the different groups that could have skewed the results. Drop some weights into the towel while it’s being held tightly, and then place the weight into the towel. Push the towel into the beaker with water, and fold and place the towel into the beaker. The teacher will call on students to describe how the differences in procedure could have affected the results.

How did your group use the gram weights for the strength test? Did everyone use the same kind of placement? Could this have had any effects on your scoring of the different brands of paper towel? Were there any differences during the procedures?

Students may not understand that in an investigation it matters that you keep all variables except one the same. In this instance, the variable is the paper towel.

 

Explanation

 

Time: 10 minutes

What the Teacher Will Do

Probing Questions

Student Responses

Potential Misconceptions

Scientists, when they are testing a product, like to keep all their testing practices the same so that the tests will be fair for all the paper towels. Introduce the idea of a variable-something that can vary each time a test is done.

Can we decide what we are going to do when we repeat our testing so that we are all doing the same test the same way?

Students may think that the word variable means change and not understand that in scientific testing we strive to control variables except one.

 

Elaboration

 

Time: 20 minutes

What the Teacher Will Do

Probing Questions

Student Responses

Potential Misconceptions

The teacher will instruct the students to perform the tests again, but time each group must agree to a class procedure. The students will determine the methods of testing and the teacher will write the group procedure on the board and the students will begin the testing. All students will record results on the data capture page corresponding to the test they are doing and remember to assign  the point value to each brand of paper towel 1 being the lowest score and 4 being the highest score the towel can get.   Everyone participating in the investigation must perform each test the same way either placing the weight in the paper towel, or dropping it in from a certain height. The teacher will monitor the groups as they begin the second round of testing looking for control of variables, and careful data collection.

What do you think might happen to our results after this round of testing is over? Why do you think so?

Be sure the students understand the scoring system of the test. One is the lowest score and is an indicator of poor performance of the towel on the test and four is the highest score and indicates the best performance on the test.

 

Evaluation

 

Time: 10 minutes

What the Teacher Will Do

Probing Questions

Student Responses

Potential Misconceptions

Post and discuss the new set of data with the students. Allow students to talk about what they saw as the differences between the tests and how those differences affected the results of each trial.

What happened when you performed the absorbency/strength test this time? How do these results compare with the results you obtained before? What was the difference, if any, in your procedure? How would you compare the data from both the first round of testing and the second?

Students may not see differences of 1 or 2 points between the first and second rounds of testing as a problem, and if it doesn’t change the ranking of the towels it may not be. If, however the ranking does change, the students need to see that the point difference is relevant.